Skip to Content

Salary or dividend ?

How a doctor running a Sàrl should pay themselves
3 August 2026 by
Salary or dividend ?
DHAC SA, Romain Geissmann

The trade-off that costs the most when it's settled at random


f you're still weighing up the legal form itself, start with our article Sole proprietorship or Sàrl for a medical practice. This one picks up where that leaves off: your Sàrl is now in place, you are both employee and owner of your practice, and a new question arises: how do you actually pay yourself the income your activity generates?

Inside a Sàrl, the doctor-partner wears two hats at once. As managing director (gérant), they can draw a salary. As the holder of the shares, they can distribute a dividend. Most self-employed people arbitrate between the two using a simple logic: dividends avoid social charges, so maximise the dividend. For a doctor, that shortcut is often a costly mistake. Three sector-specific realities distort the calculation and deserve to be settled before you fix your remuneration, not after your first year-end close.


The core principle, in one sentence

Salary is deductible for the company and subject to social charges (AVS/AI/APG, LPP occupational pension, accident insurance, unemployment insurance, etc..). A dividend, on the other hand, escapes social charges but it is paid out of profit that has already borne corporate profit tax, and is then taxed a second time in your hands, albeit only in part, under the partial-taxation regime for qualifying participations.

In other words: salary is socially charged but "clean" from a tax standpoint; the dividend is socially light but carries an economic double taxation. The optimal arbitrage is never "all of one" or "all of the other." It's a blend, and the right blend depends on parameters that doctors, in particular, tend to underestimate.

The "all dividend" reflex runs straight into the AVS

Paying yourself a minimal salary and taking the rest as a dividend looks attractive on paper. In practice, it's the first point of friction with the social-security compensation funds.

Federal Supreme Court case law allows the funds to reclassify part of a dividend as salary when two conditions are met: the salary paid is below what is customary for the role, and the dividend is disproportionate relative to the capital actually invested. When a fund considers that a "dividend" is in fact remunerating the doctor's work rather than their capital, it levies the social contributions retroactively with interest.

For a doctor, the market salary benchmark is high. A token salary of a few tens of thousands of francs set against a six-figure distribution draws attention far faster than it would for a consultant or a tradesperson. A market-conforming salary is not a free variable you can compress at will: it's the safety floor of the entire structure.

This is general information, not individual tax advice. Thresholds and practice vary by canton, by compensation fund and by your situation; we recommend having your specific case modelled.

Pension provision changes the whole calculation and it's where doctors lose the most

Here is the element that the "social charges = bad" reasoning completely overlooks: Salary feeds your 2nd pillar, a dividend does not.

For a high-earning doctor, occupational pension provision isn't a cost, it's one of the most powerful optimisation levers in the entire Swiss system. A comfortably insured salary opens access to:

  • LPP buy-ins (rachats) deductible from taxable income, often the single best tax-reduction tool available to a well-paid self-employed professional;

  • Supplementary (over-obligatory) pension plans covering the higher salary band 

  • Retirement-savings capacity that a purely wealth-based dividend never builds.

Compressing your salary to maximise the dividend therefore means, very concretely, depriving yourself of the best tax-optimisation mechanism at your disposal. Over a medical career, the cumulative gap runs into tens, sometimes hundreds of thousands of francs. This is why a "generous" salary is often more efficient than a maximised dividend: the opposite of the starting intuition.

Partial taxation doesn't erase the double taxation

The classic argument for the dividend is partial taxation: only a portion of a dividend from a qualifying participation is taxed in the recipient's hands. That's a genuine advantage but it must not be read in isolation.

The franc distributed as a dividend was first taxed at company level (profit tax), then taxed again in your hands, even if only partly. The right comparison does not pit "social charges" against "partial taxation"; it pits the total cost of the salary route (social charges + income tax, but with a deduction in the company and pension being built) against the total cost of the dividend route (profit tax + partial tax on the distribution, with no pension). Depending on income level, canton and the room left for pension provision, the outcome tips one way or the other. It's a calculation, not a rule of thumb.

The spouse and time-smoothing: two often-forgotten levers

Two adjustments round out the arbitrage and are particularly common in medical practices:

  •  A spouse who works at the practice(reception, administration, billing) can be employed at a level justified by their actual activity. This spreads household income, funds their own pension and can soften the progressivity of income tax, provided the salary matches a real contribution.

  • Smoothing over time: A Sàrl does not oblige you to distribute everything every year. Retaining profit in reserve and distributing when it's tax-efficient (lower-income years, financing a project, preparing a handover) avoids tax spikes and gives you flexibility a sole proprietorship simply can't offer.

So how should you pay yourself?

As a general rule:

  1. Set a market-conforming salary first → it's the foundation that secures the whole structure against the AVS, before dividends even enter the conversation.

  3. Fill up pension provision before optimising the dividend → LPP buy-ins and supplementary plans generally come before any distribution, especially for a well-paid specialist.

  5. Treat the dividend as the complement, not the starting point → it makes sense on the portion that genuinely remunerates capital and entrepreneurial risk, once salary and pension are calibrated.

  7. Bring in the spouse and multi-year smoothing → two simple levers, often left aside, that make a real difference over time.

There is no universal split between salary and dividend. There is a split that's right for your income level, your canton and your pension goals and it rests on a quantified model, not on the rule of thumb that "the dividend costs less."

Running a Sàrl and wondering how to pay yourself efficiently?

At DHAC, we model the salary / dividend / pension trade-off concretely for doctors: market-conforming salary, AVS safety, LPP buy-ins and supplementary plans, partial taxation and multi-year smoothing with the figures, tailored to your canton and your situation. Book a first free, no-obligation consultation and leave with a concrete comparison.


Fiduciary services: Beyond the clichés
Why your fiduciary is a year-round partner, not a once-a-year formality.